Strange Bed Partners
When the New York Times editorial board and US Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton agree on something you know the world is becoming one crazeeeeee place!
I agree with the issue at hand. There should be no “imperfect” UN Human Rights Commission that continues to allow disgusting countries like Zimbabwe, Sudan, Saudi Arabia and China to sit in judgement of other nation’s human rights records.
The compromise that is being circulated at the UN is not just imperfect, it’s a ridiculous farce. Once again you have candidate nations being submitted for membership in the UNHRC by regional blocks, thusly ensuring that prolific human rights abusers like Syria and Libya can continue to sit on the UNHRC as members of the “Arab” bloc.
A better idea than eliminating “bloc” nominations might be to eliminate any Arab or Muslim nation, other than Turkey, from sitting on the UNHRC at all. But since that idea, while backed by fact, is much too un-PC to receive hearing we’ll have to go with the United State’s original proposal: require all nations sitting on the UNHRC to be submitted and approved by a 2/3 vote of the General Assembly, not a bare majority.
So what if Amnesty International and Jimmy “Dhimmi” Carter support this compromise? I’d rather see the UNHRC abolished than accept this lame half-step towards reform. This isn’t a first or third world issue but rather an issue of human rights where people’s lives are at stake. If you doubt me on that you should journey to Darfur and ask those people how they feel about Sudan’s repeated blocking of any discussion at the UNHRC on its genocidal campaign in Darfur, I’m sure they might have a different perspective to share with you.








