
I think I badly offended and made terribly angry one of my professors last night, and frankly I could really give a fuck if I did.
This professor is well-known and highly esteemed for his work in several administrations, both Republican and Democrat. He’s of Ukrainian descent and predictably that colors his view of the strategic threats facing the United States. He views Russia as THE major problem in the future and is particularly upset at alleged Russian poisoning of former spies as well as the killing of that Russian woman journalist, who was a personal friend of his.
All fine, I agree with most of what he’s saying but his Ukrainian heritage colors everything he teaches in class. He ties everything back to Russia and constantly berates the United States for not going to war with Russia after WWII to win the freedom of Eastern Europe, the Baltic States and predictably - Ukraine.
He had us read a book in which the author savaged FDR for his “appeasement” of Stalin and then went on to minimize the destructive nature of Joseph McCarthy, a senator who went out of his way to destroy so many lives that it is almost incalculable. Now this is when I got pissed off. I said that the book we were reading was biased, that I thought FDR was one of the greatest American presidents and that McCarthy wasn’t doing anyone a favor with his witchhunts of communists and gays in the State Department.
Until that point no one had ever said anything in class, it was nothing more than 2.5 hours of lecture, lecture, lecture. But after I said that the floodgates opened. We all engaged in lively debate over many issues but the underlying theme of whatever my professor said was the usual “Russia is bad.” In addition he called me a “pinko,” a “leftie,” a “crazy from the west coast” and more. All of which I can take and I know was at least partially in jest but all incorrect. I am hardly a communist and my foreign policy outlook is far more neoconservative than most people would suspect.
So last night he was droning on and on about Vietnam and how the parallels between the war in Iraq and Vietnam were strange and eerie, but not in the way you might suspect. He was saying that the war in Vietnam was lost because of a failure of will on the part of the American people as well as a strategy of “Vietnamization” of the war, in the same way we’re trying to “Iraqize” the war in Iraq. Then he went on to savage people who didn’t serve in the war in Vietnam for this reason or that.
That was the last straw. After his speech on serving in war I asked him “So what was your excuse for not serving in Vietnam?” He replied “I had a student deferment and then my draft number was too low and then the war ended” and he asked if I was satisfied with that answer. I replied “No, but why don’t we talk about how it seems like everyone who is in favor of war and carrying out offensive actions using military force never seems to have served in the military. Why don’t we talk about that?”
Now when I said that I was mainly thinking about Cheney and Bush, not him. But he got all red in the face and raised his voice and started rambling on about him carrying information to Solidarity in Poland in 1981 and blah, blah, blah. Then he told me he loved me but I was a “real pain in the ass.” I replied that class wasn’t an exercise in propaganda and as a student I was going to ask anything that came to mind - no matter the consequences.
I turn in my final next week, which I’ll have to Fed Ex to NYU because I’ll be leaving for San Francisco this Thursday. I hope he grades me on the quality of my analysis and writing but I can’t help wondering if he’s going to give me a lesser grade because I dared to challenge him in class. And the really funny thing is - I like this professor a lot and I’m considering asking him to be my faculty advisor next year!